Another intra-club battle
Marple
E v Marple D, Board 3 12.11.2013
White: Chris Baker, Black: Neil Dainty
1.c4 Nf6
2.g3 g6
3.Bg2 Bg7
4.Nc3 d6
5.d3
Neil evidently wants to transpose into a King's Indian
but as I want to play the English, I am not going to allow this. The move d3 ensures
that I will get to play a familiar English structure.
Bit
surprised by this, I was expecting d4.
Neil
5. .. 0–0
6.e4 e5
7.Nge2
Prepares to support f4 at some stage and prevents
black pinning the knight with Bg4 as the bishop can be driven back with f3.
7. .. Nbd7
This blocks black's WSB and produces awkward
development problems for black. It is more usual to play Be6 first. On the
other hand, black's c pawn is not blocked so it will be harder for me to get a
knight onto d5.
8.0–0 Re8
9.h3
I want to put my BSB on e3 but don't want it molested
by black's knight.
9. .. Rb8
Evidently planning a queen's side pawn expansion. I
considered playing Rb1 right now to combat this and to get the rook off the
a1-h8 diagonal but decided to play for an early f4 and/or d4 instead.
The
plan is to shift the pawn on c4 to get at d3.
10.Be3 a6
11.Qd2 b5
12.b3 b4
I thought he might play bxc when I would be quite
pleased to see the b file opened. However I rather expected this move and had
seen that after Nd5 the Knight has no means of retreat and will probably have
to capture on f6. I decided that this should be positionally OK because I
expected him to recapture with his knight which would be worse on f6.
This
makes bxc less attractive but it could strengthen my BSB if I can shift my e5
pawn later.
13.Nd5 a5
14.Nxf6+
My knight was in no immediate danger of being trapped
so long as this recapture was possible.
14. .. Bxf6
I
was delighted with my position at this point as Chris doesn’t seem to have any
moves, but Fritz has my advantage as
only 0.30 – comments please!
15.Rad1
Useful to get the rook off the a1-h8 diagonal before I
play f4.
15. .. c5
16.f4 Nf8
17.fxe5 Bxe5
18.Rf3 Ne6
19.Rdf1
It seemed completely natural to double rooks on the f
file, but Fritz prefers d4. The sequence given is 18.d4 cxd4 19.Nxd4 Bb7 20.Nb5
when black would be in difficulties. Interestingly Fritz has rated us more or
less level throughout the game whereas I thought I was positionally quite a bit
better at this stage.
19. .. Rf8
20.d4 Bg7
21.d5 Nc7
22.Bh6 Bxh6
23.Qxh6 Ne8?
This should lose but I fail to notice the tactical
opportunity. Black should play Qe7 which holds everything together.
I
thought my Knight needed to go kingside.
24.Qe3?
Fritz spots the winning queen sacrifice Qxf8 after
which black is completely lost. The following sequence is more less forced.
24.Qxf8+ Kxf8 25.Rxf7+ Kg8 26.Rf8+ Kg7 27.R1f7+ Kh6 28.Rh8 Bxh3 29.Bxh3 Ng7
30.Rxd8 Rxd8 31.Nf4 Rg8.
I certainly didn’t consider that!
I think it was a mistake to put the queen behind the
pawn anyway. A better plan was to get my knight to d3 and support the e pawn
with a rook (or two) and then play e5.
24. .. Rb7
25.Nc1 Re7
26.Nd3 f5
Neil is playing this pretty well! Of course he cannot
play fxe4 because the pawn is pinned. However, my e pawn is pinned as well
which is the reason why I should have left my queen on h6.
I was pleased with this move. I now seem to have some play.
27.R3f2
Stops Rxe4.
27. .. Nf6
28.Rf4
Much better was e5. Although this gives black a passed
pawn, I would get one as well and the position would be very even after 28.e5
dxe5 29.Qxc5.
28. .. Qe8
I
now see that Re8 is much better because the possibility of a future Rxe4 is
much stronger than Qxe4.
29.Re1?
Again e5 was better with a similar outcome to before.
The standard of play after this goes rapidly downhill as both players are
getting short of time. Neil helpfully forgot to press his clock a few times
during the game and this could have made quite a difference. I would have told
him if I had noticed, but was far too engrossed in the game except on one
occasion.
I was eighteen minutes
behind after 20 moves. Not helped by not using my clock during the first few
moves. However after 26….f5 Chris had
to do the thinking and the times equalized.
I then forgot the clock again.
Rapidly downhill is no understatement!
29. .. g5?
fxe4 was better. It either wins a pawn or else, if I
retake with a minor piece I get into a very awkward pin.
30.Rxf5??
This should lose! Correct is Rff1 which would be fine,
but I thought I would be left in a hopeless position after 30.Rff1 fxe4
31.Qxg5+ Rg7 with both queen and knight en pris. I missed the fact that the
knight cannot be taken as the e pawn is pinned to the black queen. I thought
the move played would sacrifice the exchange but it should have been worse than
that.
30. .. Bxf5
31.Qxg5+ Qg6
Bg6 would leave black a piece to the good.
Doh!
32.Qxf5 Qxf5
33.exf5 Rxe1+
34.Nxe1 Re8
35.Kf2 Re5
36.Nf3
We are now down to under 3 minutes each. The rest is a
scramble!
36. .. Rxf5
37.g4 Rf4
38.Ke3 Nxg4+
39.hxg4 Rxg4
40.Bh3
Here I offered Neil a draw which he accepted.
Immediately
– my brain was too addled to think about it.
My second good derby result in a week.
½–½
A fascinating game which up until the time trouble around move 30 is very well played by both sides. It perhaps shows that I am not a natural KID player as I thought White had a significant advantage from early on but the engines don't agree. Black moves that to me looked positionally dubious like b5 and b4 stand up to scrutiny. Neil laments only being up by 0.30 on move 14 but on the night I thought Chris was better!. Even Chris' f4 , which I had mentally designated as "positionally decisive" only keeps equality.
ReplyDeleteGlenn (or anyone), please explain why you thought white was better after move 14. I need to understand the position better.
ReplyDelete